Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit: Cops subjected woman to 11-minute body cavity search during traffic stop
CBS News ^ | Julia Dahl

Posted on 08/20/2017 9:08:44 PM PDT by nickcarraway

On the evening of June 20, 2015, 20-year-old Charneshia Corley was pulled over by Harris County deputies for allegedly running a stop sign.

According to a lawsuit Corley filed against the county, deputies claimed to smell marijuana coming from her car, but found none in a search of the vehicle. And that's when things escalated.

A dashcam surveillance video, released Monday by Corley's attorney, shows a handcuffed Corley being thrown to the ground by a female officer. Although the video is somewhat obscured, the lawsuit claims that deputies took off Corley's pants, opened her legs, and searched her, shined a flashlight onto her "naked genital area" and "penetrated her vagina," all in a convenience store parking lot.

The video shows Corley lying on the ground with her legs open while two female officers alternately stand and kneel over her for approximately 11 minutes. A male officer stands close by, his back mostly to Corley and the other officers. CBS News decided not to publish the full video, due to its graphic nature.

According to Corley's lawsuit, "officers claimed to have found .02 ounces of marijuana" on Corley. The suit claims she was arrested and charged with possession of marijuana and resisting arrest, but those charges were dropped.

corley-2.gif A still image from the dashcam video that appears to depict officers conducting an 11-minute cavity seach of then 20-year-old Charneshia Corley VIDEO COURTESY SAM CAMMACK In June 2016, two of the deputies were indicted on charges of official oppression for allegedly mistreating Corley while on the job. According to Harris County District Attorney's Office Civil Rights Division Chief Natasha Sinclair, if the deputies had been found guilty, they would have faced up to one year behind bars, and/or a $4000 fine, and would likely have lost their jobs. The case was scheduled to go to trial on Monday, August 7, but according to Sinclair, their office "found significant new evidence that we believed we had to present to the grand jury."

So, on the Friday before the trial was to begin, prosecutors dropped the charges and presented the case to a new grand jury. That grand jury declined to indict the officers.

Corley's attorney, Sam Cammack, told CBS News' Crimesider that Corley did not testify in front of the second grand jury.

"I've never seen anything like it," said Cammack.

Sinclair could not comment on the evidence that occasioned the dismissal and new grand jury, or on who did or did not testify.

Corley's lawsuit against the county - which was filed in August 2016, soon after the deputies were originally indicted - alleges that the officers broke the law "by conducting an unreasonable and illegal strip search and an unreasonable and illegal manual body cavity search prior to arresting Ms. Corley, without a warrant and without any probable cause," and that Harris County "failed to properly train, supervise and discipline its officers...in regards to searches of persons," leading to Ms. Corley's rights being violated.

The Harris County Sheriff's Office did not respond to questions about whether the deputies involved were investigated or disciplined by the department, but confirmed that the two who were initially indicted are still employed at HSCO. The department also issued a statement saying that HCSO policy "prohibits deputies from conducting strip searches without a warrant. In cases in which a warrant is obtained, strip searches must be conducted in a private, sanitary, and appropriate facility."

Sinclair said that she expects people who see the video will be disturbed.

"As a woman and a prosecutor it's upsetting to watch," she told Crimesider. "We condemn these types of searches."

In 2015, just months after Corley was pulled over, the Texas legislature passed a bill outlawing warrantless body cavity searches.

"It would have protected Ms. Corley," she said. "The changes came too late."

But, said Sinclair, this new law does not impose a criminal penalty on those who break it.

Cammack says Corley is suing for $15 million and the civil case is set to go to trial in January 2018. He told Crimesider he plans to ask for an independent prosecutor to look into the DA's handling of the case against the deputies.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: bodycavitysearch; cavitysearch; donutwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Mears

Houston area. This same thing happened to a woman in the Dallas area around the same time. A short time later they passed the law against this procedure. It’s a sad state of affairs that they would even have to pass a law against cops doing this.


21 posted on 08/20/2017 11:18:02 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Did you find any drugs up in there?"

"No, but I saw three Marines in a jeep smoking cigarettes."

22 posted on 08/21/2017 5:54:57 AM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Did you find any drugs up in there?"

"No, but I saw three Marines in a jeep smoking cigarettes."

23 posted on 08/21/2017 5:56:10 AM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sargon
And to think that there are conservatives who support Contraband Law and Prohibition... STRAWMAN Son, for allegedly possessing one of God's own plants, IT IS AGAINST THE LAW Son, self-right·eous ˌself ˈrīCHəs/Submit adjective having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior. The lady doth protest too much, methink. It is evident that YOU have had runins with the LAW . and no amount of Waxing Eloquent will change that. HEH HEH You sound like a HIPPIE..
24 posted on 08/21/2017 4:44:38 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998
It's against the law? SO WHAT?

Driving with a black woman in the front seat with a white man used to be "against the law", too.

Fireworks are "against the law" on the Fourth of July.

You want "the Law" to be honored? Try not making Tyrannical law then.

Tyrannical law should be resisted—held in disdain, even.

Only a slave submits to arbitrary law.

Law which is created to control or subjugate people—when they're not infringing on anyone else's Rights—is Tyranny, and I spit on it.

"I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson
Ever hear of the Stamp Act? Look it up. Being American doesn't mean bowing down to every Tyrannical law that comes down the pike. That's one of the reasons we have things like jury nullification, for example. And Revolutions.

Americans have great respect for the Law and Authority—when it's legitimate. And when it's not, we reserve the Right to defy it—especially if it's infringing on Unalienable Rights—whether the government likes it or not...

25 posted on 08/21/2017 5:11:50 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson