Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Phlyer
I think I was doing a poor job of conveying what I was thinking, I just did a line drawing and my contention is that configuration #1 is probably more common than configuration#2. That is why I think it is indeed upside down.

I thought about the configuration of the flaps as well when I first saw the picture, and I just thought that is how they fell over time as decay occurred because the plane was inverted and gravity took them down.

79 posted on 08/09/2017 2:32:15 PM PDT by rlmorel (Those who sit on the picket fence are impaled by it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Jonah Hex; Red Badger; Robert A. Cook, PE; Bartholomew Roberts; pfflier; Phlyer; barmag25; ...
Maybe this will help us...

Here is another view of one, it could be the same plane (because the photos are from Palau also, but...it was a major seaplane base IIRC, and while this looks similar, there are marked differences in the wreckage, but there are very similar things in structure, so I thought this might help us. This one is "known" to be a Aichi E13A by the photographer.

For comparison, here is the one from the article. From the wreckage patterns, I think they are different:

80 posted on 08/09/2017 3:01:14 PM PDT by rlmorel (Those who sit on the picket fence are impaled by it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson