Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

NSLs are secret demand letters issued without court approval or independent oversight to financial institutions, telecommunications and Internet service providers and credit agencies to obtain sensitive personal information such as financial records, credit reports, the phone numbers and email addresses with which a person has communicated, and possibly the websites a person visited. The Patriot Act did not create NSLs, but before the act, only senior FBI officials could authorize their use, and the law required the FBI to certify that there were “specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe” the target of the NSL was an “agent of a foreign power.”

[ ]

The IG audits also confirmed that 40,000-50,000 NSLs were issued every year during the mid-2000s, and in 2006 a majority of them were directed against people in the U.S. This sort of broad, suspicionless collection of private data about innocent Americans is the logical result of destroying the requirement of a factual nexus between an NSL and terrorist activity.

[ ]

With no internal controls and with complete disregard for the law, FBI agents soon ignored the minimal process involved in issuing NSLs and instead issued “exigent letters,” falsely claiming emergencies to obtain records without legal process. These illegal requests—sometimes just a phone number written on a Post-it note—were often given to the telecommunications companies with the promise that an NSL or grand jury subpoena would follow, but more often than not these promises went unfulfilled. Some agents found even Post-it notes too burdensome and instead asked company employees to just pull up a person’s phone records so they could peek over their shoulder to see whether a formal request such as an NSL was worthwhile.

There are also demonstrated problems with how the FBI handles data it receives in response to an NSL. Rather than using NSLs as an investigative tool, as Congress clearly intended by only allowing them to be used when the information sought was relevant to an ongoing investigation, the FBI was using NSLs for mass data collection.

http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/national_security_letters_building_blocks_for_investigations_or_intrusive_t/

1 posted on 08/08/2017 7:22:42 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

Mueller was FBI Director September 4, 2001 - September 4, 2013.


2 posted on 08/08/2017 7:42:53 AM PDT by Ray76 (The Republican party must die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

AG Sessions will be getting Mueller and other FBI criminals indicted........................................................... any day now.


3 posted on 08/08/2017 7:46:42 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76
(from the article): " Rather than using NSLs as an investigative tool,
as Congress clearly intended by only allowing them to be used when the information sought was relevant to an ongoing investigation,
the FBI was using NSLs for mass data collection."

NSLs used not as investigation tool ,
but rather used for "fishing expedition".

6 posted on 08/08/2017 8:12:27 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (The Fourth Estate has become Fifth column !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

8 posted on 08/08/2017 8:14:16 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76; LucyT; GregNH; LS; 2ndDivisionVet; appalachian_dweller; aragorn; Arthur Wildfire! March; ...

PING!!!

(2007) Justice Department Audit Reveals FBI Misused Patriot Act

Article and comments, esp #1 among others

Thanks, Ray76 & H/T Tilted Irish Kilt


10 posted on 08/08/2017 8:15:51 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

The to convene a grand jury?


13 posted on 08/08/2017 9:17:59 AM PDT by mistfree (It's a very uncreative man who can't think of more than one way to spell a word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76; Liz
With no internal controls and with complete disregard for the law, FBI agents soon ignored the minimal process involved in issuing NSLs and instead issued “exigent letters,” falsely claiming emergencies to obtain records without legal process. These illegal requests—sometimes just a phone number written on a Post-it note—were often given to the telecommunications companies with the promise that an NSL or grand jury subpoena would follow, but more often than not these promises went unfulfilled. Some agents found even Post-it notes too burdensome and instead asked company employees to just pull up a person’s phone records so they could peek over their shoulder to see whether a formal request such as an NSL was worthwhile.

Sessions needs to haul the 'deep state' into a Court of Law...

15 posted on 08/08/2017 9:37:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (Jeff Flake - when only a shallow empty suit willing to trash fellow Republicans will do...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

Another DUH! moment and by the way - NO $HIT! We warned you.


22 posted on 08/09/2017 3:31:28 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson