So many anti-tat folks are like their skins....blank and featureless. While they may deem themselves somewhat “purer” than others, there is a lack of depth within and without. Not to mention the snooty bigotry inherent in their self proclaimed superiority.
My 1st thought when I started reading the article was why is the author hyperventilating over what someone has inked on their skin? Do fat broads wearing daisy maes in public give him the vapors, too? Is he being personally damaged by what other people look like?
I love this trashy hippie/redneck/biker rural area where I live-mostly people over 60, preppers, off griders, etc-and plenty of tats on both men and women. I don’t have any myself-T5’sguy likes his bitches without ink, as did both of my husbands-but a lot of my neighbors and most of the guys I work with do have tats-it is a personal choice. One thing you don’t see out here are overweight people-we mostly work hard, eat organic food and stay fit-if you see a white guy with dreadlocks or a fat broad in yoga pants at the nearest grocery store (18 miles), that is definitely a tourist-not a local...
T5’sguy lives/works in the city-he is really into the two of us shopping for food and stuff for our respective homes together-when it is my turn to stay at his place, instead of him at mine I’m practically dragged by him to the damn supermarket near his house-it makes me almost ill-fat women in yoga pants, shorts and crop tops lumbering through the aisles like a herd of hippos offends me-tats do not-but if they want to look ridiculous, that is their choice-not my f’ing business...