Skip to comments.
First images from Lockheed's experimental, telescope-shrinking SPIDER
New Atlas ^
| 8/3/17
| David Szondy
Posted on 08/05/2017 2:08:20 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: LibWhacker
Good concept, but looks like it needs some development enhancement.
2
posted on
08/05/2017 2:14:04 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Swordmaker; humblegunner; 50mm; Salamander; Semper Mark; JoeProBono
Just because it’s kewl - Ping!
3
posted on
08/05/2017 4:06:52 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: Paladin2
The first iteration of new technology is never as good as current mature technology.
4
posted on
08/05/2017 4:18:45 AM PDT
by
Politically Correct
(A member of the rabble in good standing)
To: LibWhacker
5
posted on
08/05/2017 4:23:58 AM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
To: LibWhacker
Seems like they could reduce the bulk even more by using a curved sensor array rather than the flat disc they are presently using.
6
posted on
08/05/2017 4:48:08 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: shibumi
Ah...the ROY G. BIV leads...almost
7
posted on
08/05/2017 4:56:14 AM PDT
by
Covenantor
(Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
To: LibWhacker
Phones get bigger.
Telescopes get smaller.
Hello, 21st century.
8
posted on
08/05/2017 5:23:38 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Islam: You have to just love a "religion" based on rape and sex slavery.)
To: LibWhacker
This is very, very big. Like the transistor, or the laser.
9
posted on
08/05/2017 5:33:17 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Liberals think in propaganda)
To: LibWhacker
(Typical disparaging comment:)
"But are the images in color?"
(Reminds me of the first reports of the merits of liquid crystals back in the day of commonplace Nixie tubes for digital numeric displays on electronic instruments. Now, we have high-def LCD TVs lit by LED arrays. Whew!)
10
posted on
08/05/2017 5:37:25 AM PDT
by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: ClearCase_guy
>>
Phones Microscopes get bigger. <<
>> Telescopes get smaller. <<
(A little more wryness in the comparison)
11
posted on
08/05/2017 5:49:48 AM PDT
by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: LibWhacker
I’d call it a high resolution digital camera, not a telescope.
12
posted on
08/05/2017 6:06:06 AM PDT
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
To: imardmd1
Thank God for LCDs.
My Nixie tube TV works great for numbers but its resolution and flicker leave a lot to be desired.
13
posted on
08/05/2017 6:08:26 AM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
To: imardmd1
>> Phones Microscopes get bigger. << >> Telescopes get smaller. << Very good. Yes. The LHC (Large Hadron Collider) at CERN is a microscope that's more than five miles across.
In fact, however, and if I read this announcement right, SPIDER is a way to make telescopes very large indeed, by "virtualizing" their optical aperture. This opens the door to amazing possibilities.
Also frightening possibilities.
14
posted on
08/05/2017 6:09:56 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Liberals think in propaganda)
To: LibWhacker
15
posted on
08/05/2017 6:11:41 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Moltke
Its an interferometer, built on a micro scale.
16
posted on
08/05/2017 7:01:46 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: Steely Tom
Also frightening possibilities. Note that in the "How SPIDER sees" image from Lockheed upthread, SPIDER is "looking" down at us, rather than out into space.
17
posted on
08/05/2017 7:04:13 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: Paladin2
Good concept, but looks like it needs some development enhancement. As you may not have noticed in the article, the telescope result image - tho clearly inferior to the target image - has to be respected considering that the test optically simulated the challenge of photographing the target image from 280 miles away. So you dont expect perfection. Presumably a larger array of sensors, which is in development, would produce a sharper image at the same distance.
Saving 90% of the mass in a satellite payload is nothing to sneeze at.
18
posted on
08/05/2017 7:07:20 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(A press can be 'associated,' or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
To: LibWhacker
Just wait until Google sends a spider sensor/network into orbit, aimed right back here on earth.
19
posted on
08/05/2017 7:45:22 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
To: LibWhacker
20
posted on
08/05/2017 7:56:52 AM PDT
by
xp38
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson