““It’s been proven beyond any doubt over hundred of years in multiple continents that the two races simply cannot peacefully coexist under the same roof””
Let’s look at this. Where in history has there been the among most murder, Chao and destruction?
Answer: Europe is one.
Look at WWI and WWII. Worse than anything and or anyplace the two races were “co-existing”.
And what happened, multi-racial USA had to go over there and twice and kick their you know what’s to stop it.
Americans, white and black together, went there and stopped the carnage and mayhem.
Glad that we’re engaging in this discussion... Maybe we’ll both benefit from it.
The examples you give are case of countries at war against each other, not of coexistence within a single country, which is what I was referring to in the case of blacks and whites coexisting with each other within the same borders.
Wars have taken place between countries and tribes for as long as man has existed. The fact that europeans have been much better at killing each other is due to their more advanced technology producing better weapons, though the hutus and tutsies did a pretty good job of massacring each other even with their more primitive weapons.
And if the point that you’re trying to make is that european countries also couldn’t peacefully coexist with each other even though they’re of the same race, I concur.
What that highlights is that there other conditions beside racial differences that can lead to non-peaceful coexistence.
1. strong differences in ideology
2. coveting of other’s possessions
3. ...
But, that there’s more than just racial differences that results in non-peaceful coexistence doesn’t negate the fact that racial differences also does.
Yes, race is not the only factor that can destroy peaceful harmony. In fact an even greater threat to civil harmony is when a country’s culture is fragmented into two or more diametrically opposed world views. We’re seeing that today in our country between conservatives and liberals. This split is causing tremendous strain in the country and if the split widens we could even see a civil war between the left and the right. The cold war was a good example of that, so was the spanish civil war.
This was also the case in the war with the nazis. Their ideology was totally antagonistic and a threat to ours plus they had territorial ambitions, so the clash was inevitable.
And they were a threat not just to white americans but to all americans, in fact even a bigger threat to the blacks, so it’s not surprising at all that both blacks and white fought their common enemy side by side.
So, yes, there’s more than racial differences that can cause discord, but that doesn’t negate the fact that race also does.
And it’s not the difference in the color of the skins that causes discord, but something much deeper and more consequential.
'multi-racial' - That is a highly debatable statement. The demographics of the US in both 1920 & 1940 were overwhelmingly white, about 88+%. The military had the same or even moreso. In addition, at that time anyway, most blacks were not in or allowed in fighting units.