To: JohnBrowdie
you’re right- this should have been a civil suit and handled without a government “fine’ for improper thought crimes.
19 posted on
07/16/2017 4:01:45 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
To: Mr. K
The thought police are having a field day with this.
22 posted on
07/16/2017 4:23:24 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
To: Mr. K
precisely. I’m a bit shocked that so few of us got that.
To: Mr. K
you’re right- this should have been a civil suit and handled without a government “fine’ for improper thought crimes. Houston narrowly avoided this sort of selected-not-elected governing board. The so-called "HERO" ordinance that would've prohibiting banning men in women's locker rooms and showers also established a kangaroo court for PC complaints in 33 pages of fine print. Doesn't take that much paper to say "men can go in the ladies' bathroom".
I hear that NYC had such a panel as well.
30 posted on
07/16/2017 7:36:45 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Bill Clinton and Al Gore took illegal campaign contributions from the Chi-Coms and 'nobody' cared...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson