[exDemMom]

Yes, yes, I know.

You fully support random unethical experimentation on helpless babies without any scientific reason or justification. You don’t care how much agony little Charlie might suffer from being treated like a guinea pig (worse than a guinea pig: there are laws against cruelty to animals). And no discussion of the horrific abuses that helpless children have suffered from unethical researchers who would do anything for science is going to soften your heart.

I totally get it.

[angryoldfatman]

You don’t care how much agony little Charlie might suffer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You can’t have it both ways. Either he’s suffering, which means the disease is not having the effect that’s claimed, or he’s got brain damage preventing suffering.

I wouldn’t expect less cognitive dissonance from a baby-killing Hillary voter. You don’t really care, you just pretend to do so you don’t get accused of loving infanticide.

Now there’s some hospital corners you’ve got to fold, before you smother some senior citizen stealing your oxygen.

BY THE WAY, your entire Nazi argument (Godwin’s Law, how wonderful) falls flat on its face when you realize Mengele’s experimentation started with healthy children and killed them, not trying to save sick children with any sort of desperate measures.

So go kill some babies and revel in evil, demonic joy.