Posted on 07/10/2017 2:25:42 AM PDT by buckalfa
Then again there is the philosophy that bad behavior should always have consequences.
Bad behavior should have consequences, but the article is talking about reducing the crimes to misdemeanors ten years after the fact. Should someone's entire life be ruined because they did something stupid 10 years ago?
There time limits on how long convitions for some things that records are kept for.
Any forfeiture some been gone in 5 years of no further convitions.
Tens years for minor crimes.
Then something like this for more serious crimes.
There is no good reason some one needs to know about a civil forfeiture years ago unless it is a ongoing broblem.
This line is confusing to me. Is there a law in West Virginia that prohibits a private employer from hiring a convicted felon?
I suspect this is not the case, and that the business owners cited here really just refrain from hiring felons to protect themselves from potential civil lawsuits by customers or fellow employees if the worker causes trouble on the job. If this is true, then are the business owners simply asking the state to help protect them by hiding the criminal records of prospective employees?
Perceptive observation. Almost all legislation is based on promoting or protecting special interests.
Which seems to me the exact opposite of what America is supposed to be about.
Could be that insurance industry has say in hiring
Higher insurance cost for employing felons perhaps
I wonder if the insurance industry has weighed in on this proposed law?
As far as I’m concerned, if we have nonviolent felonies on the books that people would not care about ten years later, they should not be felonies to begin with. Don’t edit their criminal records; change the law for future initial convictions.
would say I misread your post- but honestly i did not completely read your post
This line is confusing to me. Is there a law in West Virginia that prohibits a private employer from hiring a convicted felon?
Certain types of jobs do not allow employment with felony convictions. Security, some healthcare, teaching etc.
“A business owner who would pay high insurance premiums for hiring a felon is asking the government of West Virginia to turn that felon into a non-felon through the stroke of a pen. “
That got me thinking. Sometime about 20 years ago my brother was working for a company locally that hired work-release inmates to “save money” (least what was told). He was beat up and robbed of some money by some of these thugs. Wonder now if he could have sued his employer?
Those are all non-violent felonies. And, as an employer, I'd sure as Hades want to know if an applicant had committed any if them.
Some drug crimes and DUI might not matter, depending on the job and the details. Otherwise, I’m with you. Note: I knowingly hired someone with a felony DUI record years ago, but that was my decision as it should have been.
Sure, depending on the job. But that’s why this legislation sucks. This can’t and shouldn’t be micromanaged. Let the applicant and employer deal with it. WV is gonna rue the day this was passed.
Embezzlement is a non-violent crime. Bad accountants can once again be trusted with commercial or personal accounts?
I’ve used contractors who’ve hired guys with records. Their bosses knew and vouched for them. I knew and was satisfied with the contractors’ assurances. But that’s the point. Everybody trusted but verified. This legislation gets in the way of that. And for no good reason.
I think you explained it perfectly.
How about a Second Chance for Employment Act for Whites kicked out of their job by non-Whites?
I wonder how many of the non-violent felony convictions were plea bargained down from more serious crimes?
Happens all the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.