They really have to keep reaching further and further to make something out of this Russian Collusion nothingburger.
Notice the NYT’s sleight of hand? Notice the conflation? It’s no longer whether Trump himself colluded. It’s no longer whether his campaign colluded with the hackers of the DNC or Podesta to commit a CRIME.
Now the goalposts have moved so much as not to even be in the same stadium. Now it’s did ANYONE connected with Trump ever meet with ANYONE having ANYTHING now or ever to do with Russia for ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER even if legal.
What is the crime here? How many countless millions did Hillary accept in foreign donations from foreign governments in anticipation of her winning? And we are to believe that they did not try to protect that investment by offering Hillary info on Trump? We will never know because Trump is the only one under investigation. But what is the crime? Since when is opposition research illegal? Accepting the fake Trump dossier from a foreign source was a-ok?
What a coincidence, Trump has a great G-20 and voila and right on cue the NYT is fromt an center with “Russia” once again and with the usual twenty author by line. Color me shocked.
Now it’s did ANYONE connected with Trump ever meet with ANYONE having ANYTHING now or ever to do with Russia - or with a Russian-sounding NAME or Russian RELATIVES - for ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER even if legal.