Inglis talks of “matters.” He says the matters are more serious:
One of the two involves Barack Obama’s executive treaty concerning Climate Change. Sorry, Bob, there actually aren’t are such thing. There are no executive treaties in the country. A case could be made that Obama violated the Constitution by transferring $1 billion to a UN agency in fulfillment of his hocus pocus executive treaty, since the Constitution reserves the power of the purse to Congress. The American public considered this, along with everything else, in their decision to elect Trump. So, we should just move forward and put Obama’s abuse of power behind us. If Inglis were serious, he wouldn’t mix the Climate Change matter with impeachment.
The other matter, says Inglis, is what Trump did or might have done with regard to Russia. After months of investigation, we do not even know what this is supposed to mean. If there’s nothing there, there’s no possibility of obstruction of justice. Trump couldn’t be engaged in a cover-up, if there’s nothing to cover-up. But, even if Trump is guilty of something with regard to Russia, he has absolutely the right to dismiss the Director of the FBI. There is no allegation that Trump interfered with whatever the FBI is doing in its investigation. The Acting Director said this himself. So, we would need (1) evidence that Trump is guilty of something, and (2) some actual interference in the work of the FBI in its investigation of Russia. Maybe the big boys in the Senate (or someplace else) have reasonable suspicion of these things. But, if they do, they haven’t shared it with the public.
As for Inglis, what is he doing nowadays? After being defeated by Trey Gowdy, he went to work for a climate change group.
Well, duh!
What Redmen4ever said.
He is a Never Trumper according to Wikipedia.
I’d also note the media undoubtedly evicerated this guy back when me was voting to impeach Bill Clinton. Now he’s a distinguished expert on the subject because he’s a Trump hater.