Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind; sport; MeganC; erkelly
It needs to be discouraged because the perp was fleeing, her life was not in danger, and the law does not permit one to take revenge on a property crime. She took revenge, plain and simple.

Were the perp trying to attack her and she hit him with her vehicle, I'd be all for it. If she shot him while he was in the process of taking her purse, I'd be all for it. In both cases she is genuinely in fear for her life or serious bodily harm, and would be justified using deadly force. (And hitting someone with a vehicle is using deadly force.)

I am NOT sticking up for the perp, but I am also not going down this slippery slope.

She will be charged with assault, and she will be allowed to plea it down to a misdemeanor, but she will not get off scot-free, nor should she.

34 posted on 06/29/2017 10:03:22 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo; ConservativeMind; sport; erkelly

If I’m ever in the same situation I’ll be sure not to tell you about it.


35 posted on 06/29/2017 10:11:35 AM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Was it revenge, or did she just not want the monetary loss and replacement headache (credit cards, driver’s license, etc.) of having her purse stolen? If her husband had been with her, would he have been allowed to chase down and tackle the thief to get her purse back without being charged with assault or battery?


36 posted on 06/29/2017 10:15:32 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

There are many states in which a property crime (being in your home (property)) allows you to kill that person.


37 posted on 06/29/2017 10:22:08 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Actually, I believe the article says it is already a misdemeanor.


38 posted on 06/29/2017 10:23:29 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

“I am NOT sticking up for the perp...”

Yes, you are.

You’re saying he stole her stuff fair and square and she has no right to do something about it.


44 posted on 06/29/2017 11:32:59 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
It needs to be discouraged because the perp was fleeing, her life was not in danger, and the law does not permit one to take revenge on a property crime. She took revenge, plain and simple.


Without getting emotionally attached to one or the other folks in this incident, I am not sure her motive was revenge. She may have been simply using minimum force necessary to stop a fleeing felon.

I had a friend who once watched a prison inmate fleeing pursuing guards. The guards shot the fleeing felon. Never any charges. Isn't this similar?

Had she not stopped the suspect, chances are he would never have been apprehended, and therefore on the loose to possibly have a physical altercation from a robbery victim.

48 posted on 06/29/2017 12:38:04 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Is it not too late to appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary's crimes?z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson