Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ladyjane

I believe you are referring to a situation that existed in 1703, (not after 1800). In 1790 there were no slaves counted on the Massachusetts census. The requirement that a bond be posted by a slave owner in Massachusetts occurred in 1703.


305 posted on 07/01/2017 9:11:17 PM PDT by HandyDandy ("I reckon so. I guess we all died a little in that damn war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: x

Sorry, should have included you in post #305.


306 posted on 07/01/2017 9:14:26 PM PDT by HandyDandy ("I reckon so. I guess we all died a little in that damn war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

To: HandyDandy; ladyjane
I believe you are referring to a situation that existed in 1703, (not after 1800). In 1790 there were no slaves counted on the Massachusetts census. The requirement that a bond be posted by a slave owner in Massachusetts occurred in 1703.

Yes, the US census showed no slaves in Massachusetts in 1800.

354 posted on 07/03/2017 1:39:21 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson