Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: x

“Lincoln was trying to counter an unconstitutional secession.”

That is an interesting comment. Can you cite the constitutional provision prohibiting secession?


144 posted on 06/28/2017 5:52:33 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
That is an interesting comment. Can you cite the constitutional provision prohibiting secession?

"When, therefore, Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation. All the obligations of perpetual union, and all the guaranties of republican government in the Union, attached at once to the State. The act which consummated her admission into the Union was something more than a compact; it was the incorporation of a new member into the political body. And it was final. The union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original States. There was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States." - Texas v. White (74 U.S. 700)

150 posted on 06/28/2017 6:38:22 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: jeffersondem
Can you cite the constitutional provision prohibiting secession?

_______________

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

214 posted on 06/29/2017 1:48:12 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson