Wilson gave us the Federal Reserve, Taxes and the Inquiry (which became the CFR a couple years later.) He was controlled by Col House (who was controlled by Samuel Untemeir, likely a Rothschild agent.)
Hi Vic S. Regarding what Pres. Wilson gave us, given the remote possibility that you are not aware of the following MAJOR constitutional problems (imo) with the Federal Reserve and taxes, you may find them interesting.
Regarding the Federal Reserve, Thomas Jefferson had noted that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had decided not to expressly constitutionally delegate to the feds the specific power to regulate INTRAstate banking.
“A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank, which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution [emphasis added].” —Jefferson’s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791.
So no matter how Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers are interpreted, it remains that nothing in Section 8 can be reasonably interpreted as an express delegation of power to regulate INTRAstate banking.
In fact, state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had also clarified, in terms of 10th Amendment (10A)-protected state powers, that powers not expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So regardless if the corrupt feds argue that the Federal Reserve (FR) is privately run, it remains that the FR wrongly ignores 10A-protected state sovereignty imo.
Pres. Wilson was also wrong about taxes (imo) for the following reason. A previous generation of justices had also clarified that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, basically any issue that it cannot justify under its Section 8-limited powers.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."—Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Noting that the Founding States had established the federal Senate partly to kill bills, including House appropriations bills, that not only steal 10A-protected state powers, but also state revenues uniquely associated powers, consider this.
The ill-conceived 17th Amendment helped to foster unconstitutionally big federal government, state lawmakers foolishly giving up the voices of the state legislatures in Congress when they ratified that amendment, effectively repealing the whole Constitution by doing so imo.
More specifically, whereas the Founding States had expected the Senate to kill state power, revenue-stealing federal legislation, the corrupt Senate is now helping the House to pass such bills.
I would not say that Wilson gave us taxes, etc.. The movement for all those matters was swelling long before his presidency.