Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W

We mostly agree except for Brando. Whereas Pacino was unlucky as far as awards go, Brando got lucky.

He got top billing in spite of the story mainly being about another character. The novel was an unexpected runaway bestseller. He was surrounded by top talent in acting and directing who weren’t yet recognized at the time.

The best part of Brando’s character was the costume and makeup. He was only 47 at the time but a still photograph would never indicate it. Other than that it was all mumbling, cotton, and cue cards. His career was already in decline for many years (Brando was fortunate that he was the director’s favorite pick for whatever strange reason.) He was working mainly for money, full of himself, and a crazy Democrat who long stopped putting much effort into his acting.


151 posted on 06/15/2017 6:14:40 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
The best part of Brando’s character was the costume and makeup. He was only 47 at the time but a still photograph would never indicate it. Other than that it was all mumbling, cotton, and cue cards.

Hard to believe that same year he did "Last Tango in Paris."

183 posted on 06/16/2017 5:47:30 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

***Other than that it was all mumbling, cotton, ***

Why pick on THE GODFATHER! Brando mumbled and sounded like he had cotton in his mouth in ALL his movies! Some were still good.


187 posted on 06/16/2017 7:27:37 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson