Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SSS Two
I don't disagree with your remarks, except I think the distinction between "interview" and "memo" is thin gruel.

I don't know if it is on this thread, if not search my recent posts - I noted that since Comey probably leaked more than once, it is possible that the May 15 leak was prompted or emboldened by Trump's "have tapes" tweet. I think the point is entirely irrelevant, because the underlying "offense" happened, and the Comey admitted being the leaker. The bottom line reason why, to damage the US president by having special counsel against him" shows bad motive, but is just a political question. "Emboldened because the tapes would corroborate" is what I refer to as superfluous decoration on the facts. It doesn't color the underlying reason (wanted special counsel), it only goes to timing. Comey had been trying to damage the president with leaks, before the "have tapes" tweet came out.

38 posted on 06/09/2017 11:56:56 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; SSS Two
RE: Comey's truthfulness about memo vs interview vs leak...

Let's give it the same consideration that Trump had regarding "wiretapped" and "surveilled." We all know that the bottom line was that Trump was spied on, and we all now know that the bottom line was that Comey traded insider information.

-PJ

39 posted on 06/09/2017 12:04:24 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson