Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Comey had more than one memo, and the contents of one of the memos (not the "drop Flynn investigation" order memo) was published on May 11.

Is it possible ... just possible ... that the NYT did not have any memo for the May 11 article and that the source was an interview with Comey himself?

29 posted on 06/09/2017 10:48:40 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: SSS Two
-- Is it possible ... just possible ... that the NYT did not have any memo for the May 11 article and that the source was an interview with Comey himself? --

It's possible that the NYT never had "physical possession" of the memo, just what was read to them, orally delivered.

They could have an e-mail, digitally delivered. The mail could be an exact copy of Comey's memo with complete headers, or excepts. Comey's name could me "masked" from an email, so NYT would have to trust its source.

I wouldn't say the physical possibilities are endless. But no matter how you slice it, Comey leaked directly or indirectly to the NYT, before the May 12 tweet.

31 posted on 06/09/2017 11:09:13 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson