Posted on 06/02/2017 4:42:22 PM PDT by heterosupremacist
AP says that some of Linda Sarsour’s critics “have spread false internet reports claiming she supports Islamic State militants and Sharia law.” In fact, she is guilty as charged. I made such an accusation on May 22, and I stand by it.
At this year’s Women’s March on Washington, Sarsour stood proudly with her friend, Rasmea Yousef Odeh, a terrorist who was convicted in 1970 for her part in two bombings; two Israeli students were killed while shopping for groceries.
Sarsour was one of four women who invited the convicted Muslim terrorist to join with them. Why did she welcome her if she does not support “Islamic State militants”?
On February 10, 2015, Sarsour was interviewed by Rachel Maddow on MSNBC. The Palestinian activist expressed concerns over the treatment of Muslims in the United States, specifically complaining about the “twenty-two states with anti-Sharia bills.”
(Excerpt) Read more at catholicleague.org ...
We should have 50 states with anti sharia bills.
You mean, 57 states.
dfwgator wrote:
We should have 50 states with anti sharia bills.
You mean, 57 states.
Well played, gator...
We should have no need for anti-sharia laws. Sharia should be rejected out of hand as incompatible with the fundamental principles of our judicial system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.