That's what you've got? A 105 year old hoax to counteract more than 150 years of evolutionary science?
nah- we’ve got amth biology thermodynamics chemistry on our side as well=- all of which are impossible for evolution- Chemically pure anhorations out of dirty chemicals foudn in nature? Nope- sorry- Upper probability limits far surpassed for even just one positive mutation- say nothing of the billions of needed positive mutations needed in order for evolution to be true- biological impossibilities, irreducible complexity- on and on and on it goes- oh, and no transitional lines found- sure they tried deceiving people with deceitful drawings linking entire line of evolution- which is still visible in books today- even after being caught for doing so- Eukoroytes did not evolve, but they did result in symbiotic relationship- blowing another major evolution lie that is taught in schools out of the water
There’s a whole l ot more than just piltdown man- just spend a few hours on IRC- there are reams of evidences that debunk most of the major evolution lies- There are several great sites- and you can find william demski’s site which proves evolution is mathematically impossible- look up ‘chemical impossibility of evolution’ too just for fun in your spare time
Say what?! You have a bizarre definition of the term “science” because so far the evolutionists have not presented a single shred of evidence to corroborate their psychopathic & UNSCIENTIFIC blather. Where are the fossils to prove their delusional one dimensional hypothesis? How can an obvious programming code like DNA manifest WITHOUT a programmer? How can the essential life sustaining process of clotting EVOLVE without killing the subject? How can the process of natural selection occur without killing off whole species? Any mutant offspring often die out rather than become the norm contrary to evolutionist meanderings. Those alleged human ancestor sea creatures that supposedly flopped around on land after exiting the ocean before “transitioning” into rodent like creatures WOULD HAVE BEEN EASY PREY & WOULD HAVE BEEN PICKED OFF BY PREDATORS. Simple logic DISPROVES the theory of evolution in spades. The evolutionists expend an awful amount of superfluous energy in attempting to deny the obvious fact that humans were CREATED by a purposeful designer / creator. Why is that? What are they trying to hide & obfuscate? What are they so afraid of? Are they perhaps serving a dark anti-human agenda? Are they the spiritual manifestation of a demonic consciousness that HATES humanity & revels in misleading them about their true origins? Do they fear the natural spiritual power of humans & work ridiculously hard at preventing them from learning the truth? Do they fear the creator they pathologically deny as part of a psychological coping mechanism or process aimed at attempting to mollify their paranoid fears of retribution incurred by their dark anti-human agenda? The evolutionists do not have the moral high ground by asserting that humans are the spawn of pond scum - because getting the people to accept the ridiculous & hateful notion that they are the product of pond scum is the height of unscientific based psychopathy aimed at gas lighting the public into accepting that there is no significance to their existence & that they then should ACQUIESCE in the face of their evolutionist overlords who tell them ad nauseum that there are “too may humans” who are “hurting the planet” & that they must “go away” [ re depopulation ] in the name of “saving” the planet. So no I will never get on board this psychopathic agenda of rationalization for the deliberate reduction [ re: genocide ] the human population. Look into the Globalist sickos who first promoted this psychopathic delusion euphemistically called “the theory of evolution”. What sanitized claptrap. The theory of evolution is just a sick but clever political cover for the rationalization for the mass GENOCIDE / depopulation of the human population.