Evolution is a theory and doesn’t claim without uncertainty to explain all genetic changes over time. The IC”R” again posits no alternative view to explain, other than to say “God did it”. This is a fine theological position but it lacks any scientific proof.
The faithles IC”R” seeks to prove God through science. It seeks to completely invslidate a theory through the inherent imperfection of any scientific theory.
These Godless and incompetent fools never fail to amuse.
“Evolution is a theory and doesn’t claim without uncertainty to explain all genetic changes over time.”
Yes to an extent. There are theories under evolution which would make claims that can be proven or disproven. It’s not a theory if it does not makes claims that can be proven or disproven. You really hit on the main reason evolution isn’t really a theory and can’t be disproven. It’s only actual claim is everything found conforms evolution because nothing else can be.
Which is actually, oddly, good enough, bit it’s philosophical, not necessarily scientific. One can’t scientifically study God or God did it.
“The IC”R” again posits no alternative view to explain, other than to say “God did it”. This is a fine theological position but it lacks any scientific proof.””
A rather obvious observation. Usually atheists are quite proud of themselves and assured of their genius for having a partial grasp on something so self evident.
[[The IC”R” again posits no alternative view to explain, other than to say “God did it”.]]
As opposed to the evolutionist’s ‘Nature did it”- very often they simply claim things happens ‘naturally’ without giving any evidence that proves nature was even capable o bucking hte odds to do so- Miller tried once when trying but failing to explain how blood clotting could evolve, his explanation only ended up proving that an intelligent designer was needed, and carefully controlled conditions were needed in order for it to occur’ naturally’ lol
So yeah- when you dismiss one practice, be sure not to overlook the fact that the other practice you advocate for doesn’t do the same hting