Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

To get this resolution without the magnifying power of the Sun, we calculate that you would need a telescope with a diameter of about 75,000 kilometers, or about six times the diameter of the Earth. This is, to put it mildly, impractical.

...

No it wouldn’t.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_optical_interferometry

Using the sun for gravitational lensing would be far more impractical.


8 posted on 05/31/2017 12:10:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
I've been a huge proponent for space-based optical interferometry for a long time. Ever since I first heard about interferometry.

For instance, why not build an interferometer the size of the solar system? Imagine what we could see with that baby!

But I've been told there are problems that will need to be overcome. Cost is a big problem, but one article I read said flying such a large formation of telescopes in rock solid unison down to a fraction of a wavelength is a big problem.

Not sure why, myself. I mean, if you look at a parabolic mirror, it doesn't matter which precise bits are present, only that they are present and span a great distance, and any variance could, it seems to me in principle, be fixed with signal processing and correction. Does that sound feasible to you?

Anyway, I'm on board with space-based optical interferometry!

9 posted on 05/31/2017 1:11:07 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

18 posted on 06/01/2017 12:58:26 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson