Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

If we were living in the year 1965, I’d agree with you, but optics have gotten so much better.

The inexpensive Nikon P900 Coolpix can get focus on the moon at 233,000 miles away, so focussing in on a satellite should be a piece of cake at a few miles away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfshAzV0FN4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clg7rQB6H2U

So where are the photos of all that “space junk” and even the ISS from the earth?

Should be a piece of cake.


44 posted on 05/31/2017 5:37:48 PM PDT by Sontagged (Lord Jesus: please expose, unveil and then frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Sontagged

I am a professional photographer.

I have a Nikon d4 and use a 400 2.8 telephoto on a regular basis.

The moon is huge and it reflects a ton of light.

A satellite is tiny and moving. Fast. It’s not going to happen. Especially with a prosumer camera.


46 posted on 05/31/2017 5:46:45 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Sontagged

http://www.space.com/40-spotting-spaceships-earth.html


49 posted on 05/31/2017 6:05:45 PM PDT by Truth Addict ("Whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth..." - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson