[House Atreides]

Well, I guess the UNANIMOUS Supreme Court decision is legally wrong and you are right. /sarc

The correct test is whether the officers were reasonable in using force to defend themselves...nothing more. The Supremes got this one right IMHO.

[eyeamok]

they raided the makeshift residence of Angel Mendez and his wife, Jennifer, without a warrant, court records show.

Sig Heil!!

[taxcontrol]

Legality is far different from my stated opinion. Darn it. Then world would be a much better place (for me) if it ran the way I wanted it to. /sarc

Too bad the same test does not go the other way.

[Oil Object Insp]

I guess cops are allowed to "defend" themselves​ if they kick or enter any door and are confronted by someone perceived to be a threat? I wonder if your opinion on siding with a group of detached black robe eletists protecting their goose stepping thugs when it's a house of someone you know will change? When it happens to you it's too late to attempt to get your allies to come to your aide. "Lawful protection" for LEO, even when they are botching the job? Any professional who cannot be held accountable for their errors, due to protection by the courts from the people is a thug. No other way to slice and dice. Goose stepping, jack boot thugs. Acts like this are what erodes the peoples confidence and trust. - Law in the court, Justice in the streets. Choose just one,. They are mutually exclusive. More so each day, for the normal people. Perhaps you confirm yourself with the others?