Yeah, maybe. Or it could be accepting the rule of law.
Miller v Alabama is pretty clear that imprisonment without chance of parole for juveniles isn't constitutional.
Pretty sure he was tried as an adult. He was never tried in Alabama and some other states where they killed. They could possible do it now and give him death.
#1 - Miller v Alabama was also an insane ruling (based on the criteria for the decisions). Add to it - it simply goes against logic and reason.
17 years old - old enough to make the decision to murder across states with his “friend”. How many did he kill (that we know of)?
Which of those victims get a “re-do”?