Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: posterchild
Why would someone fill in a pool with concrete?

I wondered, too.

Why not just use fill dirt? Seems like concrete potentially makes for a lot of extra work later, if ever the site is to be used for something else.

40 posted on 05/24/2017 2:44:36 PM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer

Exactly. Why pay extra to create a mess which reduces the usefulness of your land? This applies whether you sell it to someone else or use it for other purposes later.

I understand getting rid of the pool for liability reasons. I don’t understand why concrete is the preferred way to do it.


47 posted on 05/24/2017 3:18:24 PM PDT by posterchild (Treade a worme on the tayle, and it must turne agayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer
Why not just use fill dirt?

That's what I was thinking.

49 posted on 05/24/2017 3:33:42 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson