Replies

"I'll start this off."

The speculation started the day Rich was murdered. Ten months later, despite numerous "bombshell" revelations, we still have only a couple of rumors to go on, along with a little circumstantial evidence. Here's my summary:

1. Juliann Assange repeatedly denies that the source of the DNC leaks was a "state player," but is unwilling to name the actual source.

2. Seth Rich is murdered; there are no suspects. Some people claim the "robbery" theory is bogus, since none of Rich's belongings were taken. (Another plausible explanation: after the shots that killed Rich were fired in a public place, the killer or killers fled in panic.)

3. WikiLeaks offers a reward for information leading to the arrest of Rich's killer(s). The DNC has offered no such reward.

4. Months later, Wheeler comes forward with the claim that in the days before his death, Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks, and was in fact the source for as many as 44,000 leaked DNC emails. He claims that a source in government has confirmed this, but does not name the source. He also claims that Rich's computer holds key evidence, but how he knows this is not clear. He says the computer is in the possession of law enforcement.

5. Sean Hannity and Newt Gingrich, not generally known as conspiracy theorists, seem to give credence to Wheeler's story, and the story is reported on Fox News.

6. This week, an obscure DC computer hacker claims that Wheeler's story is true, because the hacker was himself involved and working with Rich. He offers no evidence to back his claim.

That's about it. Huge claims, no hard evidence.

Conclusion: the story is either (1) bogus; or (2) one of the most shocking conspiracies in American history, worthy of Alex Jones, in which many levels of government have conspired to spread a false story of Russian involvement in the leaks, have issued false reports, are investigating allegations they know to be false, and may be covering up a murder related to the actual source of the leaks.

This is typical of Clinton’s past. This is how it’s done. Yes, they paid off Mary Jo’s family. They can afford it and it works. Someone on FB said clinton’s ‘past’ did not happen because snopes said so. It did happen... the airport, the chicken magnet, the brother, and the mr and mrs clinton. and it’s so far beneath human thinking that the press will never report it... it’s not believable.

Conclusion: the story is either (1) bogus; or (2) one of the most shocking conspiracies in American history....

It would be quite a leap to claim the story is bogus for the following reasons.

1.Uhhh.... Rich is dead in case you didn't notice.

2. A class action suit is underway by donors of bernie sanders for 85 million to get there money back since Sanders was indeed defrauded by hillary/dnc. the scam was basically what amounted to two sets of books. One the real one and the other one with her voters substituted for Bernies so he could not possibly have beat her in the primaries.

3.Julian Assange is the only one who knows who leaked the DNC info to him. He has worded his support of Seth Rich(played over and over by Hannity) as a leaker and the danger he endured in such a way that only the purest of dems would think anyone else did it,such as the ruskies for example,had done the leaking.

Rich was secretly a hardcore Bernie supporter,with lots of evidence for that claim.

If all that doesn't lend toward motive for the DNC to take him out including Podesta's claim that whomever did it will pay, then cirumstantial evidence doesn't exist.

We have a body,murder,law suit, and now motive.

4. The way things were handled at the hospital and the e-mail form the fourth year surgical resident is compelling.

Especially since the med person did not know at the time it was Seth.So you have a "blind" witness coming forth with compelling info on how rich was murdered a second time.

I could go on but if you are not convinced now.....