Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius

Thanks for the lesson! Sure would like to know the reasoning behind that....is it a recent development?


14 posted on 05/12/2017 11:06:46 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper; PJBankard
From the article, a point on Pennsylvania law, which goes back to the Revolutionary Era:

Although it is unusual for a judge to order a prosecutor to file criminal charges, there is a basis in Pennsylvania law for the judiciary to step in and essentially take control of a criminal investigation, said Temple University law professor Jules Epstein.

The hurdles for such action typically are high, he said, because of the separation-of-powers doctrine, which grants each branch of government wide discretion within its own sphere of authority.

But Epstein said case law in Pennsylvania lays down guidelines for when a judge can compel a prosecutor to accept a citizen’s criminal complaint, the scenario that played out before Neifield on Thursday. Courts are more inclined to hear such requests when there is a dispute over the legal basis for bringing charges, Epstein said. The standard is more stringent when a prosecutor, as a matter of policy, declines to bring criminal charges.

17 posted on 05/12/2017 11:12:30 AM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson