Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mazda77

Ford class carriers were going to have an electric catapult, but supposedly Trump didn’t like it and ordered them to be redesigned to have the traditional steam catapult. Some people say it was a very bad decision.

Here is an article and the relevant part - http://time.com/4775040/donald-trump-time-interview-being-president/

“On the future USS Ford-class carriers

You know the catapult is quite important. So I said what is this? Sir, this is our digital catapult system. He said well, we’re going to this because we wanted to keep up with modern [technology]. I said you don’t use steam anymore for catapult? No sir. I said, “Ah, how is it working?” “Sir, not good. Not good. Doesn’t have the power. You know the steam is just brutal. You see that sucker going and steam’s going all over the place, there’s planes thrown in the air.”

It sounded bad to me. Digital. They have digital. What is digital? And it’s very complicated, you have to be Albert Einstein to figure it out. And I said–and now they want to buy more aircraft carriers. I said what system are you going to be–”Sir, we’re staying with digital.” I said no you’re not. You going to goddamned steam, the digital costs hundreds of millions of dollars more money and it’s no good.”


8 posted on 05/12/2017 3:47:14 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Krosan
In spite of President Trump's rhetoric, the future USS Ford class carriers will not be using steam.

Trump has no idea how much money it would take to redesign Kennedy and Enterprise, the next two carriers, for steam. The reactors would need to be redesigned, the fresh water desalination plant greatly increased in capacity, much of the deck and below space redesigned, etc. Instead of saving money, it would cost even more to revert to steam for these next two carriers.

Futures carriers reverting to steam is about as credible as Trump pricing out some Boeing F/A-18s to replace F-35s.

14 posted on 05/12/2017 5:33:09 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson