Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody; Krosan

Looks like a good idea. Very similar to rail-gun technology I believe. How did that work out? Do we have operational systems?


5 posted on 05/12/2017 3:39:07 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

Ford class carriers were going to have it, but recent news is that Trump didn’t like it and said to redesign it for steam.

It all looks strange and the media might be reporting it in a biased way so that is why I put a keyword “navy” and asked for opinions.


7 posted on 05/12/2017 3:43:46 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

I believe the issues with EMALS are completely different issues from those with rail guns, InterceptPoint.

My understanding is due to the high muzzle velocity at which projectiles leave a rail gun, there is abnormal wear and tear on the rail portion of the delivery system to the point it causes a wide spectrum of issues, most specifically accuracy, range, and safety. It is actual mechanical wear and tear in a very short period of time due to the extreme speed of the projectile as it leaves the gun.

I don’t see where that same kind of issue would rear its head in an EMALS setup.


17 posted on 05/12/2017 6:10:50 AM PDT by rlmorel (President Donald J. Trump ... Making Liberal Heads Explode, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson