Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2017 3:22:45 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Krosan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_Aircraft_Launch_System

EMALS is not the problem.

The procurement system is.


2 posted on 05/12/2017 3:26:11 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Krosan

Just another attempt by press to demonize trump.

They’re trying to make him sound like a fickle loose canon insisting on things outside of his expertise.
They carefully ignore or hide the possibility that he was given sound advice by relevant experts that the new tech was a big mistake he should fight against.

I am not some personality cult worshiper of trump, I just have so little trust in what I read from the press


3 posted on 05/12/2017 3:29:49 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Krosan

Would you please give us some idea of what the debate is?

Amusement parks are now using the new technology and in reality have been at the forefront for a while now. It is actually much easier and less resource intensive than the steam. Although steam is readily available, especially on nuke carriers because to the steam required for the turbines to create energy for the screws, the piping and maintenance of those lines and controls is far more intensive that the ELMS. Both take their energy from the same source, the steam generated power for the entire carrier.

https://www.cnet.com/news/need-for-speed-how-coasters-are-getting-faster-and-scarier/


6 posted on 05/12/2017 3:43:36 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

9 posted on 05/12/2017 4:14:03 AM PDT by Chode (My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Krosan
It is true that Ford has had some issues with the EMALS. It is a new design and growing pains are expected. The Navy will test, evaluate, and fix where needed to get it right.

We aren't going back to steam catapults no matter how much the salty old dogs wish we would. EMALS allows for smaller crews which is where all Navy shipbuilding is headed but most importantly, EMALS allows for launching of lighter UAVs, which is where all of naval aviation is headed. Steam is too powerful for these lighter, unmanned aircraft.

President Trump kinda blundered on this a bit and it might have been preferable if he had expressed his criticism in a less public manner.

25 posted on 05/12/2017 6:46:45 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Krosan

I like steam catapult as the aircraft carrier goes chuga chuga woo! woo! as it launches aircraft vs electric catapult which just goes whiiirrr whoosh!


31 posted on 05/12/2017 2:13:22 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Krosan
Steam catapults are labor intensive. That's what I did in the Navy. I retired in 1997,(where does the time go?) The EMALS had been in the works and we'd hear stories about it being developed, I haven't seen it in operation.

The concept sounds good but from articles I've read reliability of the EMALS was a problem. Don't know if that has been ironed out.

The steam cats and arresting gear are both hellish places to operate and maintain, brutal but reliable, proven.

There are a myriad of benefits behind getting away from the steam cats. Problem is, whatever you replace it with has to be as reliable as the steam system.

Something else about the FORD, they have a new Arresting Gear system, which has had it's own problems.

Saw this article here, that touches on that subject.

Navy Sticking With Advanced Arresting Gear in Next Carrier

Development was delayed. Same contractor as the EMALS system?

That's probably what has Trump upset, cost overruns and delays!

36 posted on 05/14/2017 3:02:44 AM PDT by csvset ( Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson