Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one

I’m pretty sure it won’t be passed. This is too easy to demagogue and the spineless Rs won’t support it, to say nothing of the traitorous Ds.

If we want to chip away at the NFA we might do better starting with SBRs. It’s easily the most non sensical thing to have on the NFA. It’d be harder for bed wetters to demagogue it any more than they do already with guns in general.


9 posted on 05/06/2017 3:32:51 AM PDT by JamesP81 (The DNC poses a greater threat to my liberty than terrorists, China, and Russia. Combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81

It seems to me that the “spineless Rs” owe the NRA a couple of touchdowns. The rats can bitch and moan about it all they want. It’s not as if they won’t be bitching and moaning about something else anyways. And suppressors protect hearing so it’s a health issue.


12 posted on 05/06/2017 5:02:39 AM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81

The suppressors are so dangerous that I have never in my lifetime heard of a murder with a suppressed firearm....outside of movies. The addition of a suppressor makes a handgun as hard to conceal as a rifle.

It’s real value is on a rifle anyway, IMO.


22 posted on 05/06/2017 8:10:24 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson