Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward

Since the rape charges against both are being dropped, it can be assumed that there is not evidence to prove she didn’t consent to having sex with both.

One interesting aspect of this case is that if the girl sent the images—presumably of herself—that form the basis for the child pornography charges, perhaps she could be charged with child pornography as well. I believe two teens in North Carolina were charged for taking nude photos of themselves.


60 posted on 05/05/2017 10:34:31 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: drjimmy

“Since the rape charges against both are being dropped, it can be assumed that there is not evidence to prove she didn’t consent to having sex with both.”

Possibly. Or her misrepresentations raised enough doubt to not continue the case.

The article states the selfies were sent only to Montano who then forwarded them to Milan. This seems to be a pretty strong indication she wasn’t interested in encouraging the older Milan.

I’ll take any charges they file against these two. But it’s bizarre Milan might not be included in the child porn charges when the images were still on his phone.


63 posted on 05/05/2017 2:45:33 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson