No they are not. The guy is a proven con artist. He resisted arrest by law enforcement and received the same treatment anyone else would get.
“He resisted arrest by law enforcement and received the same treatment anyone else would get.”
Uh, they weren’t arresting him. and they weren’t law enforcement. they were airport rent-a-cops, and they enforcing a civil contract by dragging a 69 year old Asian man who was minding his own business, and bloodied his face, broke two of his teeth and gave him a concussion.
AND all three rent-a-cops were suspended and their bosses said that they were appalled and this would never happen again, AND United said they would never use rent-a-cops or real cops to ever do this again.
But you’re absolutely delighted with the way this went down and even think it should happen exactly like this to anyone else in that circumstance. Why?
He was never “under arrest”. He had no police charge filed against him in the incident. In fact, two of the airport police involved in the incident are under investigation and have been suspended.
“He resisted arrest by law enforcement and received the same treatment anyone else would get.”
If he was resisting arrest, why was he not charged with resisting arrest?
And if he was resisting arrest, what was he being arrested for when you claim he was resisting arrest?