Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: huldah1776
I was shocked at the low percentage of reported cases. That would mean either the vets are not going in for treatment, or they are not actually developing PTSD. If they are not developing it, what is different about being an Australian as opposed to American?

Only a fairly small proportion of recent Australian veterans have seen real combat conditions. Even though tens of thousands have served in the recent wars, the vast majority have been in support roles - for the most part only our elite units have been routinely deployed to combat (not just special forces (SAS, Commando, etc), but even the 'regular' infantry units deployed have been the best of those - the Royal Australian Regiment, in particular). That could explain some of this - my impression is that the US has deployed a much wider range of forces into combat situations.

(Of course, just about any soldier or other serviceman can find themselves in combat but there is a different risk profile for somebody working in logistics and support, from somebody in a frontline infantry unit - it's all important work, worthy of respect, but it's not the same).

15 posted on 04/24/2017 10:09:28 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

True but you don’t need to see combat to develop PTS. I think I’m going to do a little more research about Brits and Aussies. The American lifestyle is unique and may be causing more boots to get it.


20 posted on 04/25/2017 5:22:19 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson