Is circumcision the law of the land? (Don’t go there Larry, don’t go there!!!!!) It was 1952. I’m still traumatised. Every time I look down I’m reminded. The bastards!
And while I find that slicing-off a girls clit is rather abhorrent. There is this Jewish remant thing about removing a Christian boys skin as a sign.
Yes, it may be a healthier process in avoiding AIDS or any other multiutude of diseases, including cancer, but is it really necessary that I lose my foreskin or she her clit for the cause? Nay, Nay, Nay (Told ya I was in a foul mood today)
It is both revolting and absurd and cruel and ignorant to compare these two practices. Many uncircumcised little boys suffer some painful disorders—
>...lose my foreskin or she her clit ...
I’m going out on a well worn limb here and just say that as far as damage and elimination of pleasure goes, the female loses MUCH more.
Anyone caught cutting off critical parts of females needs jailed for life and having their glans completely removed.
I prefer we not go there...as FGM also includes sewing up of most of the vulva, with the intent to sex as painful as possible (so that the women have no reason to cheat on their men). On top of that, they always do it without anesthesia, when the girl is about 10 years old - they want her to experience real, real, pain during the ordeal.
There is no comparison...not even close. But the left is pushing that angle as a way to deflect criticism of FGM.
There is no comparison between the two practices. Do yourself a favor and read up on the differences.