Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

No two to four years older.


66 posted on 04/10/2017 3:19:08 PM PDT by Little Bill (VN 65 - 68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Little Bill
Still rather young for the grooms, when it was "normal" for men to not marry until they were somewhat "settled", had good jobs, and could afford a wife and a family.

Would I be wrong is assuming that they were farmers/lived in rural areas?

I ask, because, in the Victorian/Edwardian ears, in large cities, people married at a later age ( though still young, when compared with today's stats ) than those who lived in the country did.

67 posted on 04/10/2017 6:51:24 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson