Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Phil DiBasquette

“Not really, sonny, pay attention

blah blah

I just want the counter argument to the “24 million
will lose coverage” line I am hearing every day”

Sounds like you’re not paying attention, genius.

I said earlier that the “tens of millions” or “24 million” DO NOT MATTER. The 350 million matter. Gubmint (backed by taxpayers) cannot subsidize that many people. Let them find out what is best for them AFTER the repeal. It is none of gubmint’s business to “help” them. Got it?


53 posted on 03/25/2017 9:22:32 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: sagar

Once more into the breach, the new lib talking point is
24M would have been de-insuranced by the reworking of Marxist-Muslim care and I am only interested in how the left arrived at that number and what the real effect would have been, not just their warped take.

Inquisitive people want to review what the media parrot to them and refute it if possible.


96 posted on 03/25/2017 3:13:03 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson