Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick; lee martell

Often times, when publicists and photographers think that a person looks ‘best’ from a certain angle or with a certain expression, they tend to overdo it. This results in an excess of the flat, neutral expression, because don’t you know, a smile might expose bad teeth, or lines and wrinkles, or (horror) dimples.

Can’t have any of that going on now, can we?

Personally, I think she’d be much more attractive if she looked a bit less self conscious, and more happy instead.


11 posted on 03/21/2017 8:11:16 AM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Kommodor

By English standards, she’s OK.

By American standards, she’s “meh”.


12 posted on 03/21/2017 8:20:17 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kommodor
I think she’d be much more attractive if she looked a bit less self conscious, and more happy instead.

I agree.

14 posted on 03/21/2017 8:26:53 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("If race is just a social construct, we might as well be honest about rewarding obnoxious behavior.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kommodor

Good points. Maybe this actress has only just emerged from the where to maintain a flat neutral look equals ‘Looking older’. Maybe in her Potter Roles, she wanted to project in implication of maturity and steadiness. Many girls contemplete wanting to ‘look older’ long before boys do.
As a young adult, she may benefit by expanding her palette of
known expression choices.


15 posted on 03/21/2017 8:33:59 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson