Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
I hope that you are not referring to the "domestic insurrection" part. Otherwise, and yet again, I have to ask you to please be more specific. This is becoming tedious. I feel like I am doing all the heavy lifting.

You do know (I mean obviously you do with a name like "jeffersondem") that the following was stricken from the final version:

""He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another."

Thomas Jefferson

73 posted on 03/22/2017 9:36:12 PM PDT by HandyDandy ("I reckon so. I guess we all died a little in that damn war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: HandyDandy

“You do know . . . that the following was stricken from the final version: . . .”

Yes. When I refer to the Declaration of Independence, I’m referring to the one that was voted on and adopted. In other words, approved. I am not referring to earlier drafts that were considered and rejected.


74 posted on 03/23/2017 7:15:08 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: HandyDandy
Every once in a while Wackypedia gets it right. This is one such instance.

The sources and interpretation of the Declaration have been the subject of much scholarly inquiry. The Declaration justified the independence of the United States by listing colonial grievances against King George III, and by asserting certain natural and legal rights, including a right of revolution. Having served its original purpose in announcing independence, references to the text of the Declaration were few in the following years. Abraham Lincoln made it the centerpiece of his rhetoric (as in the Gettysburg Address of 1863), and his policies. Since then, it has become a well-known statement on human rights, particularly its second sentence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

This has been called "one of the best-known sentences in the English language",[8] containing "the most potent and consequential words in American history".[9] The passage came to represent a moral standard to which the United States should strive. This view was notably promoted by Abraham Lincoln, who considered the Declaration to be the foundation of his political philosophy, and argued that the Declaration is a statement of principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted.

The thing I keep forgetting is that not everyone views the Constitution or the DOL the same way as we do.
75 posted on 03/23/2017 8:20:42 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson