Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

I believe it is mostly about producing the right ratio of materials to either compress to create the explosion or to build a shotgun type device. The actual physical parts are probably beyond for a few years, but building a 5-8 pound nuclear device is probably possible.
No, I am not a nuclear physicist, just a guy who reads a lot of stuff. Most of it way beyond me...lol


9 posted on 03/18/2017 9:28:58 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rustyboots

There are limits for a fission device. The smallest you can do with plutonium (hottest) is about a 4” ball. With a fusion device, set off with lasers rather than a fission trigger..... interesting.

Very tiny H-bomb, almost no radiation to deal with.

Interesting.


16 posted on 03/18/2017 11:42:11 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rustyboots

I don’t believe a true nuke explosion device can be that miniaturized.

Implosion is method to reduce the amount of core material, but it uses shaped charges to get past sub critical mass reaction.

Dirty bombs? Yes.

True nuclear explosion, no.


23 posted on 03/19/2017 5:44:08 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rustyboots

Not going to happen.


26 posted on 03/19/2017 6:45:33 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson