I’m sorry, but I believe the story about Larry King and a million dollar verdict against him for child abuse is just more internet BS, like this entire Pizzagate BS.
You made the accusation that there was such a verdict against Mr. King. Prove it, or quite frankly, someone representing Mr. King might ask you to prove it in court. I do not represent him, nor would I ever do so, but quite frankly, it would be a rather easy case to move forward to a sizeable verdict.
A TV personality’s good name is his stock in trade, and attacks against it are very serious. Just ask the Maryland man who paid Mrs. Trump a significant sum for calling her a former “escort.”
No, international child abuse has not been the essence of this thread. It has been another attempt to sucker the unsuspecting and the fools into wasting time trying to chase the fog of a supposed Pizzagate child abuse scandal that never had an element of proof about it, with the possible exception of the fact that the Podestas had bad taste in art, in which case which you had better lock up the 1000 people a day who visit MOMA.
As I said, there is way too much really wrong with Washington and Obamaism for conservatives to work on rectifying, rather than wasting time on this perverted diversionary BS.
This will not be addressed further. If you chose to attack me as opposed to the issue, so be it. It would only confirm Alinsky-esq training demonstrated by some here.
“You made the accusation that there was such a verdict against Mr. King. Prove it, or quite frankly, someone representing Mr. King might ask you to prove it in court.”
Really? Which Mr. King did I “accuse”? I don’t personally know the particular Mr. King and could not identify him, having only seen a person in a grainy video many years ago. Whoever he is, he is certainly not the well-known radio/television personality.
Let’s not forget that you were the one who brought up intimate details of the Franklin case...and then challenged me when I told you that some of the accused perps apparently have convictions or indictments, or civil judgments for related offenses.
Do your own research and answer your own questions, if that is something that interests you. All of the information is in the public domain, either in books or on the web. The information has been there for a very long time, yet none of the authors have been sued, websites shut down etc. Have fun!