Posted on 03/04/2017 11:15:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Get these claims out there as many times as possible on the MSNBCs and CNNs of the world and eventually people will think they are true and factual.
Without any evidence to back-up the claims or substantiate their statements.
This used to be called rumor-mongering or gossip-spreading or plain old storytelling, as in lying.
Look it up in the current political dictionary. It's called FAKE NEWS.
Gets old doesn’t it!
Isn’t this the guy that the GOPe worked to put in the Senate so as to keep Christine O’Donnel out? Reason being COD would have thrown a wrench in the 0bamacare works.
If memory serves...
Please identify and post the names of any GOPers and fake FR conservative posters, you find in the painting.
All the CIA/FBI have is analysis (aka an opinion) that Russia was the source of the leaks on Podesta and Hillary. That is ALL they have - no evidence. They can’t even make that connection, let alone a giant leap that Trump was ever part of a conspiracy with Putin.
This. Yet we continue to be bombarded with democrats not only claiming links, but now the talking points are that there is more and more information every day. What are they talking about? Not one of them I have seen interviewed can present a single fact - they only avoid the question.
I still think as others do - Trump and his surrogates as well as every member of the GOP should start to present the democrats with the evidence of the Uranium 1 deal, the evidence of Podesta’s business dealings with pro-Putin forces in the Ukraine, and ask why did Bill Clinton get 500k for a speech in Russia at the same time his wife signed off on giving the company that donated over 100 million (yes, over 100,000,000 dollars) to the Clinton foundation. A foundation where most of the money was spent on employees.
Enough is enough. At this point, Trump should appoint a special prosecutor and convene a Grand Jury to look into the real ties with Russia - Clinton. Consider - did the Trump foundation receive over 100,000,000 dollars from pro-Russian interests or did the Clintons? Did Melania Trump or Bill Clinton receive a huge speaking fee (and likely others) from Russian interests? Did Clinton’s Chief of Staff or Trump’s have millions of dollars of stock interests in a pro-Putin business?
I think our side should start hammering this over and over. Maybe use some humor - oh yeah, you mean when Melania got 500k for a short speech? Oh yeah, you mean when Trump approved the uranium deal for huge donations to his foundation?
It would hit the mark for me at least.......
I feel your frustrations!
“What do you mean ...is going to get REALLY messy.; it already is.”
No, this will later look like the clean phase.
correct...he said “whether or not” the transcripts show collusion..i myself still don’t believe Russia hacked Podestas e mail or where wiki leaks got em. Weird thing to me...is that there wasn’t one single e mail to or from Hillary herself...strange.
That's not going to happen.
Is Soros going to pay and arm the BLMers and others, so that they can kill us off?
Just WHAT are you implying?
yep
“How so...do you expect the American populace, or at least some of it, to rise up, form an army, and advance on DC?”
Nope.
“That’s not going to happen.”
Gee, no kidding.
“Is Soros going to pay and arm the BLMers and others, so that they can kill us off?”
No.
“Just WHAT are you implying?”
Something less than what you’re imagining.
Then tell us just what it is that you are imagining.
I agree - the problem with investigations is sometimes they end up where you don’t think they will - in this case, perhaps up Coons and Schiff’s butts.
That must be why i heard from an impeccable source that Al Franken, at this very moment, is on the senate floor with a blown up copy of that picture sitting atop a tripod. Claiming that it is irrefutable evidence of Trump’s guilt.
“Then tell us just what it is that you are imagining.”
It seems to bother you that I didn’t so I won’t. Enjoy.
Fine...then I’ll just chalk your banal posts up to being garbage.
Is this Sen. Coons way of admitting that he has first hand knowledge of illegal wiretaps? lol
Someone told me that they were told by someone who saw this someplace: senator coons is the anti-Christ.
1) The senator later took to Twitter to tamp down the liberal excitement over a possible smoking gun. He emphasized that such transcripts could show collusion. He does not know.
Oh, I see, so they "could" show it .... Or not. Conceivably these same transcripts could show where Jimmy Hoffa's body is buried, or where Coronado's Treasure is hidden, or the map to the Seven Cities of Cibola, or Atlantis. Mind you I'm not saying they do or they don't. I'm just saying they "could". So consider that enough reason to print a 100-point font headline based on my startling new revelation, ok?
2) Note Coons is - ironically! - on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Meanwhile, over on the House side of this joint investigation: "House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican, has said at two press conferences that he has seen no evidence of Trump-Russia contacts or collusion during the campaign."
BOTTOM LINE: The House half of the investigation has not seen the slightest bit of evidence. But a Democrat on the Senate side trumpets to the world that "there *could* be" evidence, and then backs away from it to say that he's not seen it, but he can't rule out that it does NOT exist.
3) Some great comments at the WT link above. Here's one: "While I have no proof, I believe Chris [Sen Coons, D-DE] has a dead hooker in his closet. We must investigate further." Heh heh!
Great. And I’ll just keep concluding you’re a moron and a drama queen. And I’ll be right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.