Posted on 03/01/2017 9:13:32 AM PST by simpson96
After losing the presidential election in 2012, Mitt Romney disappeared. The only evidence he still existed came from random sightings—at a movie, a gas station, Disneyland, Costco, McDonald’s, etc. Romney posted a Thanksgiving photo on Facebook and visited the White House on November 29, 2012 at President Barack Obama’s request. He then completely dropped off the face of the earth between December 9, 2012 and February 27, 2013.
It wasn’t until about this time in 2013 that he spoke publicly in an interview with Fox News, after which he disappeared again until people began asking for his opinion on the 2016 presidential candidates.
Losers of past presidential elections have also left the spotlight immediately following campaign losses. (snip)
The same cannot be said for Hillary Clinton. The day after the election, Clinton was photographed with a supporter. She gave her first post-election address just eight days after losing. (snip)
Clinton has also been tweeting regularly. Well, someone’s been tweeting from her account, because some are signed “-Hillary” or “-H” to signify they’re actually from the former candidate. Each time Clinton, or someone, tweets from her account, articles are written. The account tweeted on Inauguration Day and in support of the Women’s March (though none were signed from Clinton herself).
Clinton recorded a video message weeks after the march for the 2017 Makers conference, telling participants “the future is female.”
Who needs men?
“And remember, you are the heroes and history makers, the glass ceiling breakers of the future,” Clinton said. “As I’ve said before, I’ll say again, never doubt you are valuable and powerful and deserving of every chance and every opportunity in the world.”
Well, so long as you’re a woman who holds liberal viewpoints.(snip)
Forgive me if I don’t value the opinion of a twice failed presidential candidate.
(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...
Her TV network was a total flop. I don’t know how media/business savvy she really is.
IMO, she’s successful because she was in the right place at the right time. Since BHO, the truth has come out about how much Oprah really resents and hates white people.
I don’t see her as viable at all.
I’d be more worried about MO.
hmmmmm....good point. MO is well-spoken. Far better than hilary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.