Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tony75034

I interpreted the original ad differently, that the wall was a literal barrier to their illegal intent and the door a metaphor for the legal method of immigration. If their intent was otherwise, the door would have been omitted.


3 posted on 02/07/2017 6:17:14 AM PST by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869

The ‘door” should have involved the process to become a legal citizen, not just a hole in the wall.


5 posted on 02/07/2017 6:20:41 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

But legal immigration would involve simply driving to the border. No need to go on a multi-day quest hopping trains and walking across the desert.


14 posted on 02/07/2017 6:41:25 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

According to the head honcho of 84 (who is a Trump supporter) that’s exactly how she meant it.


33 posted on 02/07/2017 1:25:08 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson