Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: veracious

I’ll wait for the ‘translation’ into everyday English.


2 posted on 02/04/2017 9:33:52 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lee martell

The left are anglophobic, heterophobic and deploraphobic.


4 posted on 02/04/2017 9:42:13 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

The left are anglophobic, heterophobic and deploraphobic.


5 posted on 02/04/2017 9:42:14 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell
In all Cases ... in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction

It seems like SCOTUS may have _original_ jurisdiction over the recent, Federal judge ruling, stopping Trump's immigration change. Wasn't this case Washington State VS US (executive) government. If so, can any lawyers, including DOJ, read and follow US law?

The original jurisdiction of a court is the power to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, when a higher court has the power to review a lower court's decision.

I think what he's saying is the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction, and therefore the court which made the ruling has no jurisdiction. I'm not a lawyer and haven't looked at this issue; that's just my interpretation of the point he was making.

7 posted on 02/04/2017 10:01:12 PM PST by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson