Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2017 4:10:59 PM PST by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: oldasrocks

It is one method by which liberals can eliminate inheritance among the middle class. I believe property is seized by the state rather than the feds.


2 posted on 01/06/2017 4:14:50 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldasrocks
I've read that a surviving spouse gets to stay in the family homestead until he/she dies and *then* it can be “seized” and sold.
3 posted on 01/06/2017 4:15:11 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldasrocks

In California if you reveive Medicaid(welfare) between 55 and 65, Your Assets are ATTACHED!


10 posted on 01/06/2017 6:03:15 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oldasrocks

When my parents both needed care in a nursing home, we looked into what the requirements were for Medicaid payments. The state required that they sign over all their property to the state BEFORE payments would start. The bureaucrat we talked to actually said they would have to sign over their property even before they would even consider if Medicaid would pay. If there was money left over after they passed away, the state would reimburse the estate any amount left over. Note that the state is not very efficient in selling property. I would suspect that the gentleman in the home didn’t even own the property.


11 posted on 01/06/2017 6:04:41 PM PST by norwaypinesavage (The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson