Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

Yup, I cancelled both National Geographic and Smithsonian years ago when they went full-tilt political starting with the global warming crap. Just like this article, they slip a little in here and there.


6 posted on 01/04/2017 10:50:46 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SW6906
I am letting my National Geographic magazine subscription expire after receiving their January 2017 issue. The subscription was a college graduation gift from my parents and I have kept it up for 50 years. But after seeing this issue, no more.

This issue has absolutely nothing to do with geography. From the cover, which is some pink clothed girl/guy/whatever to the entire inside contents, it is about gender issues and pushing the LGBTXYZABC movement. These sexually miscreants make up about 1-2% of the total US population but we are being force fed this agenda everywhere, including National Geographic.

I am not interested in their liberal agenda. They should stick to geography and stay out of political discussions. I tolerated the global warming crap over the years but this issue is over the top. It used to be a great source of information and photos from different parts of the world. It made a nice coffee table magazine. No more with this cover. It went directly into the trash as soon as I saw it. Disgusting.

 photo NatGeoCover_zpsu242ivj2.jpg

30 posted on 01/04/2017 11:45:55 AM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson