Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) claim another scalp. So Mizzou players threatening to boycott with the support of their coach to force administrators over so-called hate crimes good. Players threatening to boycott over their teammates being investigated by Title IX Star Chambers bad.
1 posted on 01/04/2017 6:42:33 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Well, I am glad he has been fired. Took a stand against his employer. He does not work for the juvenile FB players.


2 posted on 01/04/2017 6:44:46 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

It’s all Red on Red as far as I can tell. Let them eat their own.


3 posted on 01/04/2017 6:45:02 AM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

If the officers cannot control the mercenaries, The Prince at the earliest possible opportunity must replace the officers.


5 posted on 01/04/2017 6:47:27 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The Minnesota football players involved are maybe the most disgusting pack of feral wolves I’ve ever read about.

I read the University’s internal report regarding the gang rape of this woman, it is absolutely sickening. What started out as a consensual act with a drunken young, stupid woman became an evil gang rape, and these pigs who participated in it—some who recorded it waiting their turns—should be delivered to the worst prison in the country and never allowed freedom.

No decent person amongst them, the 10 who were suspended and 5-10 more who couldn’t be identified. Filthy horrid scum.


12 posted on 01/04/2017 8:00:11 AM PST by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Before I jump into the lynch mob, there are two questions that need to be answered:

(1) What players was Coach Claeys supporting in his statement? I assume the ones that voted to boycott in support of their teammates, not the ones involved in the incident. I can easily see a coach praising his players for taking action when they felt that their teammates were being railroaded. That this question even has to be asked suggests that the statement was poorly written but that doesn't constitute grounds for dismissal.

(2) When was the information contained in the EEOC report known to Coach Claeys? In a "he said she said" situation, I could see a coach (and teammates) supporting the players until some solid facts emerge.

If Coach Claeys knew of the contents of the EEOC report before he issued the statement, then he has little grounds to complain. If he wasn't aware, then the action seems way too much like a cover-your-butt action by the university and which permanently damages the reputation of this coach.

Having worked in academe most of my career, I've come to the conclusion that there are no more unethical organizations than universities. Their operating assumption is that anything that protects the reputation of the university is ethical and they'll throw anyone under the bus to protect that reputation.

16 posted on 01/04/2017 10:28:27 AM PST by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of incompetence and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson