Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tired&retired

Well, I’m not against that action .. but Clinton got rid of them because they knew too much about Clinton’s activities already .. and he knew he was in trouble if he didn’t get rid of them.

However, I’m not sure the same problems exist now.

But, if you could find somebody who would be able to investigate and interrogate those attorneys, there may be a whole bunch of them who are ready to skuttle all the Obama junk.

I’m happy either way. I am just going to have to trust that whoever is in charge of the attorneys is the right person to figure out if the attorneys are telling the truth or not.


3 posted on 12/26/2016 1:13:48 PM PST by CyberAnt (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CyberAnt
However, I’m not sure the same problems exist now.

Of course not. We've got the opposite problem.

Clinton got rid of attorneys who might have actually prosecuted Clinton and others for high crimes and misdemeanors. Trump needs to get rid of attorneys who refused to prosecute a Clinton and Obama and others for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Lock Her Up!

14 posted on 12/26/2016 4:37:59 PM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson